Engine Comparison & Decision Guide
Database Engine Comparison & Selection Guide
Find the optimal database engine based on your exact workload architecture requirements.
Workload Decision Matrix
Recommended Engines
Top Pick: PostgreSQLPostgreSQL / MySQL / SQL Server
Core financial banking, order processing, strict ACID compliance, and relational data integrity.
Full Architecture Comparison Table
Memory management, replication HA, and critical pitfalls side-by-side.
| Motor | Tür | Lisans | Port & CLI | HA / Failover | Güçlü Yanlar | Kritik Tuzaklar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PostgreSQL | relational | Open | :5432 (psql) | High availability and replication available. | 100% ACID compliance with zero license lock-in | Ensure proper memory and connection pool limits. |
| MySQL | relational | Open | :3306 (mysql) | High availability and replication available. | Immense community support and native tooling | Ensure proper memory and connection pool limits. |
| Microsoft SQL Server | relational | Commercial | :1433 (sqlcmd) | Always On Availability Groups (AG) delivers database-level synchronous/asynchronous replication, automated WSFC failover, and readable secondaries. Failover Cluster Instances (FCI) and Transaction Log Shipping provide robust DR topologies. | Rock-solid HA with Always On Availability Groups | Leaving Max Server Memory unconstrained, starving the host operating system |